Hafrok
Developers · leaderboard
methodology ↓
operating under construction adv. development early development proposed (not ranked) bars are net GW · one scale within each section · solid is ranked, hollow is proposed

Developers

30 Ordered by operational + under-construction + advanced-development GW, net of stake
RWE
profiled
grossnetn
Operating
6.11 3.24 19
Construction
3.94 2.68 4
Adv. development
11.70 6.36 10
Early development
4.00 2.00 2
Proposed
— —
Ørsted
profiled
grossnetn
Operating
10.73 4.95 29
Construction
7.19 4.37 6
Adv. development
1.95 0.97 2
Early development
4.33 2.93 3
Proposed
0.57 0.57 1
Vattenfall
profiled
grossnetn
Operating
4.45 3.21 14
Construction
0.98 0.98 1
Adv. development
7.23 5.22 6
Early development
3.10 1.80 3
Proposed
— —
SSE Renewables
profiled
grossnetn
Operating
2.17 1.01 3
Construction
3.60 1.44 3
Adv. development
7.60 5.84 5
Early development
5.90 2.99 3
Proposed
— —
Equinor
profiled
grossnetn
Operating
1.23 0.42 5
Construction
5.85 2.97 6
Adv. development
1.56 0.78 1
Early development
6.45 5.39 6
Proposed
14.37 7.18 7
Ocean Winds
profiled
grossnetn
Operating
2.87 1.54 6
Construction
0.39 0.39 1
Adv. development
2.25 2.00 2
Early development
3.75 3.38 4
Proposed
15.22 15.22 5
TotalEnergies
profiled
grossnetn
Operating
1.72 0.46 2
Construction
0.82 0.40 2
Adv. development
3.84 2.79 5
Early development
11.00 8.00 9
Proposed
6.13 6.13 2
CIP
profiled
grossnetn
Operating
1.80 0.97 4
Construction
0.49 0.49 1
Adv. development
3.99 1.98 6
Early development
13.18 6.27 10
Proposed
7.18 3.32 10
Skyborn Renewables
grossnetn
Operating
1.38 0.53 4
Construction
1.15 0.42 2
Adv. development
2.38 2.38 2
Early development
1.00 1.00 1
Proposed
2.60 2.60 1
ScottishPower Renewables
grossnetn
Operating
1.10 0.62 2
Construction
2.36 1.66 2
Adv. development
0.80 0.80 1
Early development
5.00 5.00 2
Proposed
— —
Masdar
profiled
grossnetn
Operating
1.54 0.51 4
Construction
1.40 0.70 1
Adv. development
3.00 1.47 2
Early development
— —
Proposed
— —
PGE
grossnetn
Operating
— —
Construction
1.50 0.75 1
Adv. development
2.37 1.85 3
Early development
— —
Proposed
— —
EDF Renewables
profiled
grossnetn
Operating
1.86 0.72 6
Construction
0.45 0.19 1
Adv. development
3.15 1.50 4
Early development
1.94 0.50 2
Proposed
12.96 11.64 7
Macquarie
profiled
grossnetn
Operating
1.97 0.94 7
Construction
— —
Adv. development
3.78 0.95 3
Early development
1.60 0.55 4
Proposed
4.50 1.75 3
Iberdrola
profiled
grossnetn
Operating
1.32 0.92 3
Construction
0.32 0.16 1
Adv. development
0.79 0.79 1
Early development
0.01 0.01 1
Proposed
0.24 0.24 1
Northland Power
grossnetn
Operating
1.19 0.90 3
Construction
2.16 0.87 3
Adv. development
— —
Early development
— —
Proposed
— —
Polenergia
grossnetn
Operating
— —
Construction
1.44 0.72 2
Adv. development
1.56 0.78 1
Early development
— —
Proposed
— —
ESB
grossnetn
Operating
0.80 0.27 2
Construction
1.08 0.54 1
Adv. development
1.98 0.68 2
Early development
1.50 0.50 1
Proposed
— —
Synera Renewable Energy
grossnetn
Operating
0.50 0.20 2
Construction
— —
Adv. development
1.29 1.29 2
Early development
— —
Proposed
— —
Parkwind
grossnetn
Operating
0.81 0.68 4
Construction
— —
Adv. development
1.50 0.77 1
Early development
— —
Proposed
— —
Shell
profiled
grossnetn
Operating
1.60 0.86 3
Construction
0.76 0.46 1
Adv. development
— —
Early development
— —
Proposed
17.04 17.04 6
Dominion Energy
grossnetn
Operating
0.01 0.01 1
Construction
2.60 1.30 1
Adv. development
— —
Early development
0.80 0.80 1
Proposed
— —
JERA
profiled
grossnetn
Operating
0.78 0.21 4
Construction
— —
Adv. development
2.12 0.95 2
Early development
4.90 1.73 2
Proposed
— —
Vårgrønn
grossnetn
Operating
0.29 0.08 1
Construction
3.60 0.72 3
Adv. development
0.56 0.28 1
Early development
1.85 0.85 2
Proposed
— —
EnBW
profiled
grossnetn
Operating
0.98 0.49 4
Construction
0.96 0.48 1
Adv. development
— —
Early development
3.90 2.45 2
Proposed
— —
ORLEN Neptun
grossnetn
Operating
— —
Construction
— —
Adv. development
0.90 0.90 1
Early development
4.10 4.10 4
Proposed
— —
BP
profiled
grossnetn
Operating
0.55 0.11 2
Construction
— —
Adv. development
1.50 0.75 1
Early development
4.90 1.73 2
Proposed
3.00 1.33 2
Eneco
grossnetn
Operating
2.60 0.66 6
Construction
0.76 0.08 1
Adv. development
— —
Early development
— —
Proposed
— —
Fred. Olsen Seawind
grossnetn
Operating
— —
Construction
— —
Adv. development
1.30 0.65 1
Early development
1.00 1.00 1
Proposed
— —
KOEN
grossnetn
Operating
0.03 0.03 1
Construction
— —
Adv. development
0.60 0.60 1
Early development
— —
Proposed
— —

Pipeline-only & sub-scale

80 Speculative pipeline or sub-scale — nothing committed or advanced yet
Nadara 4.40 GW Avangrid 4.06 GW Vineyard Offshore 2.95 GW Luxcara 1.87 GW VinEnergo 1.15 GW Qair 1.01 GW Flotation Energy 0.95 GW Deep Wind Offshore 0.78 GW Mainstream Renewable Power 0.76 GW DEME Concessions 0.71 GW Ignitis Renewables 0.70 GW Elicio 0.63 GW SK Ecoplant 0.50 GW Gulf Energy Development 0.48 GW Korea Offshore Wind Power 0.46 GW BayWa r.e. 0.45 GW Taiwan Power Company 0.40 GW BW Ideol 0.36 GW B.Grimm Power 0.35 GW Gentari International Renewables 0.30 GW Trianel Windkraftwerk Borkum 0.28 GW Vena Energy 0.26 GW Statkraft 0.25 GW SK E&S 0.25 GW Chubu Electric Power 0.23 GW CPP Investments 0.21 GW Siemens Financial Services 0.21 GW OX2 0.20 GW Yushan Energy 0.20 GW Agnes 0.20 GW Qint'X 0.20 GW Saipem 0.20 GW Kansai Electric Power 0.15 GW EWE 0.14 GW Akita Offshore Wind Corporation 0.14 GW Korea East-West Power 0.12 GW GreenIT 0.12 GW SK Eternix 0.11 GW INPEX Corporation 0.07 GW Korea Midland Power (KOMIPO) 0.07 GW European Energy 0.06 GW Phu Cuong Group 0.06 GW Renexia S.p.A. 0.03 GW Simply Blue Group 0.02 GW HOFOR 0.02 GW Petrobras 0.02 GW BlueFloat Energy — SENER — Eolus Vind — Hexicon — Neoenergia — Bosford Participações — BI Energia — T&T Group — EVNGENCO3 — Bunbury Offshore Wind Farm Pty Ltd — Ørsted Offshore Australia 1 Pty Ltd — Myoungwoon Industrial Development — Greenalia — IberBlue Wind — Ilmatar — Svea Vind Offshore — Enefit Green — Haixia Power — Eólica Brasil — Cemig — Kaanda Rebeca Marques Cunha — Monex Geracao de Energia S.A. — Shizen Energia do Brasil Ltda — Energy Oasis Generation Corp. — NOVA Energy Corporation — TOTALPower, Inc. — Airstream Renewables Corp. — Earth Sol Power Corp. — Citicore Wind Cagayan, Inc. — Vind Energy Corp. — Domhain Earth Corp. — Jieyang Qianzhan Windpower — Huaneng International Power Shareholding Jiangsu Clean Energy Branch — CGN New Energy (Yangjiang Yangdong) —

Investors & capital

21 Financial funds & strategic co-investors — hold stakes, don't lead delivery
Norges Bank Investment Management 2.04 GW KKR 1.38 GW Enbridge 1.12 GW Ingka Investments 1.06 GW Equitix 0.88 GW Stadtwerke München 0.78 GW Nuveen Infrastructure 0.69 GW Sumitomo 0.66 GW Greencoat UK Wind 0.58 GW TRIG 0.55 GW Brookfield 0.43 GW Mitsui 0.43 GW Octopus Energy 0.41 GW PKA 0.27 GW Energy Infrastructure Partners 0.27 GW PensionDanmark 0.20 GW Schroders Greencoat 0.12 GW Banque des Territoires 0.10 GW Development Bank of Japan 0.08 GW Tokyo Gas 0.01 GW Marubeni —

China

21 A category of its own — China's domestic, state-led market
China Three Gorges 9.91 GW Huaneng Group 6.40 GW CHN Energy 4.28 GW China General Nuclear 4.25 GW State Power Investment Corporation 4.11 GW China Longyuan Power 2.69 GW Mingyang Smart Energy 2.01 GW Guangdong Energy Group 1.90 GW CNOOC 1.81 GW Shandong Energy Group 1.80 GW Goldwind 1.21 GW China Datang Corporation 1.20 GW Shanghai Electric 1.11 GW Huadian Group 1.10 GW China Resources Power 1.10 GW Zhejiang Energy Group 0.90 GW Shenergy Group 0.81 GW Straits Power 0.81 GW Suntien Green Energy 0.80 GW GCL New Energy 0.55 GW Sinohydro 0.19 GW

How the ranking works. Developers are ordered by net GW of operational + under-construction + advanced-development capacity — what's generating or on a credible path to it (advanced development = consent granted, offtake secured or FID taken). The speculative Early Development stage is excluded from the rank (shown separately as "pipeline"), so a wall of early-stage claims can't lift a developer above one that's actually building. Every project's owners are expanded by ownership look-through — a stake held through a JV or SPV is traced to the parent and multiplied down the chain — and net capacity is that stake-weighted sum. China is a separate category (a developer whose net capacity is mostly in Chinese waters — a domestic state-led market not comparable to the global field), as are co-investors — financial funds (pension, yieldco, sovereign & infra capital) plus strategic stake-holders (trading houses, municipal utilities buying minority JV stakes) that back projects but don't originate or build. Active fund-backed platforms that lead delivery, like CIP, Masdar and Macquarie/Corio, stay among the developers. A profiled chip marks developers carrying an authored strategic profile; coverage is partial and does not affect placement. Figures are derived live from projects.yaml.

Gross and net. Every row on a card carries both. Gross is the full nameplate of each project the developer holds a stake in — the capacity it has a hand in, whatever the size of that hand. Net is its own share, after ownership look-through. The spread between the two is stake density, not an error: a firm with 3 GW gross and 0.4 GW net is a minority partner across large projects, and one whose columns nearly meet owns what it develops outright. The bar is net, coloured by lifecycle stage.

Every row here is a current holding, at one of the four lifecycle stages. Capacity a developer has sold — divested or farmed down — is not shown on these cards: it is measured differently from the rows above it, stake-weighted only and from an ownership ledger covering roughly a quarter of records, so it neither adds to nor reconciles with them. It belongs on each developer's own page, where a per-deal table can carry those limits, and it is there under Divested & farmed down.